Suri was suffering from a heialrp, thatc2b4s why there was no photo true?! Nope. Shec2b4s a healthy, gorgeous little girl. Sources in Life & Style said TomKat would split in early 2006. True? Well, since TomKat married by the end of 2006, I guess: nope. Sources in Us Weekly said Katie will never return to work true? Well, since her next movie was just announced, I guess: nope. Again. And about Tom is done in Hollywood how come Redstone just admitted he never fired him? How come he has the whole of Hollywood power playesr behind him? Any other actor you know who makes 1 billion dollars in the box office in one year while being boycotted and over ? Sorry to burst your little bubble but even if Tom is in the closet and Katie paid off to act her part, hec2b4s still the most sought after movie star in Hollywood as Redstone kissing his dick kinda proved.Care to comment on that??

the concealment of Suri stnkis of Tom trying to manipulate the situation by creating mystery and thereby driving the price up. Over at People, a source tells TMZ that the photos would fetch less than Shiloh's. The source says the main draw is not the baby or Tom but Suri's mom People are fascinated by Katie Holmes, who's leading such a weird life now, transforming from an apple-cheeked All-American girl into the Bride of Scientology. An Us Weekly source also believes that Suri photos would be a less valuable commodity than Shiloh pics. The thinking Brad and Angelina were beautiful and romantic after their baby was born. The source says the value in Suri pics have more to do with the freak factor of her parents.And there's this One editor told TMZ that the price of the photographs would depend in no small part on where the proceeds from the sale end up, implying that it would be a very different matter if the millions went to African orphans than straight into the coffers of the Church of Scientology.

You people with your robot like blind deivootn to TC, it's pathetic. WHY on earth would you bash Brad and AJ for donating 4.1 million dollars to a charity? I mean WHY, can someone just come forward and explain why you believe this is a bad thing???Anna, can I just say you are a terrible spokesperson for the TomKat crowd. You fail at making any kind of point.The money has nothing to do with it, it's about making the right choices.One couple took control of the media, and donated 4.1 million dollars to charity.The other couple did a 22 page spread, and the only people to profit from that was Vanity Fair.You mention AJ living off Brad .uuummm, and what has Katie been doing?Your completely IDIOTIC comment about posing for pictures, are you KIDDING?? Would you like to comment on the THOUSANDS of posed pictures the two media whores posed for on a daily basis if not twice a day FOR MONTHS at something as private as their childrens sporting events?????? Please, share with me how that's somehow better than what anyone else does? You make NO SENSE with your hateful ramblings!!!Would you also like to comment on how T&K whored out Suri at their wedding? The first public pictures at that media circus PLEASE!!! They keep the baby hidden for months saying loud noises aren't good for babies, they're afraid of the paparazzi, they're keeping her safe and then they expose her to THOUSANDS of photographers and paps, and flash bulbs at their wedding!!!!!HYPOCRITES!!!!!!!And lastly, I'd like one of you rabid TC fans to answer this question for me, although I'm pretty damn sure I won't get an answer.How do you feel about Tom Cruise leaving Nicole Kidman FOR NO APPARENT REASON mere months after she had miscarried his supposed FIRST biological child NOT COINCIDENTALLY right before he would have had to honor the payoff of their 10 year marriage contract was due to be up????Answers .anyone???